seraphcelene: (pic#523339)
Brave, how I love thee, let me count the ways.

Too often, Disney films featuring female leads (generally a princess of some kind and in one way or another) revolve around reductive agency. Even with heroines coded as independent and with subplots that suggest a higher or greater purpose (i.e. Belle's pursuit of knowledge in Beauty and the Beast, Ariel's thirst for freedom and adventure in The Little Mermaid, or Pocahontas's desire to save her people) the story always winds up as a treatise on how Our Heroine gets a man in the end. Happily Ever After as it has been codified for women in Disney films means marriage, of course.

Culturally, American society likes to privilege romantic love over every other kind of love and nowhere do they showcase that preference better than in films. So, the first time that I saw Disney's Brave I was utterly thrilled and completely charmed. I fell in love with the essential relationship at the heart of the story, Merida and her mother, Eleanor. Like many Disney princess films, Brave is a love story. However, unlike the typical Disney princess films, it is not about romantic love, rather it is about familial love. A few years later, Frozen would do something similar and come under fire for it in the process, but let's not forget that Brave did it first.

In Brave we are shown the importance and intensity of familial love. Personally, I think that it's even more important that it's Mother/Daughter love. Too often that relationship is depicted as fraught an unforgiving. It plays into the stereotype of toxic and competitive women's relationships. An even though the relationship between Merida and Eleanor begins strained, over the course of the film they each learn to understand the other. There is never a question that they love each other, but it is the way that they learn to deal with each other and to LISTEN to each other that, I believe, is most important here. The result of that relationship rekindling is never demonstrated more beautifully that at the end of movie when Bear!Eleanor breaks free of her bonds and takes on Mor'du as he towers over Merida, roaring in preparation of the kill. It is telling, I think, and deeply appropriate that neither Merida's father nor any of the men of the clans are able to save Merida. It is Eleanor's job to do and the opening up of Merida's relationship with her mother has lead them there. Their conflict becomes overwhelmed by the action in that moment and the battle is beautifully representative of what has always been true, even when Eleanor and Merida could not see it for themselves: Eleanor's love for her daughter (and Merida's for her mother in the moment when she defends Bear!Eleanor from her father).

I love the battle between Eleanor and Mor'du because I am a sucker for Mother/Daughter relationships. And Eleanor, willing to sacrifice herself to save her daughter, is the epitome of the ultimate mother sacrifice. Merida's realization that perhaps she realized her mother's value much too late is equally impactful. But of course, this is a Disney film. But here happily ever after doesn't end with a man and a wedding gown, rather it ends with Merida and her mother having learned to understand and appreciate each other. Their love for each other is point and it is recognized and celebrated as the ultimate prize.
seraphcelene: (Daryl/Beth by kadie_darling)
Saw Into the Woods this morning, one of my favorite stage productions ever. I've seen the PBS broadcast of the original Broadway production too many times and loved it too well to give an objective opinion about the film adaptation. I liked it. I actually did. The kid who played Jack was especially endearing. Emily Blunt was phenomenal and who knew Chris Pine could be so roguishly cute and sing about it all. Meryl Streep, well, she was no Bernadette Peters, but she held her own on the singing and she was killer in all the emoting.

Still ... there was something missing in the heart of the story. I'm sure that wasn't helped by my distraction as I attempted to suppress the urge to sing along to every g-damn song that made it into the movie. Yes, I know them all by heart. Worth an afternoon if you like stage plays and musicals.
seraphcelene: (it mocks me)
In 2004 I read Caitlin R. Kiernan's Murder of Angels. I loved it. I loved it so much that I went and found all the other books that she had written and requested them at my local library. When they arrived, I checked them out and took them home; there were five books in all.

I remember sitting on my bedroom floor with my treasure. I was so excited that I couldn't decide where to start. I stacked them up. I looked at them. Quite at random, I picked up Low Red Moon. I opened it and read the first chapter, maybe five pages in all. I closed it and opened up Silk. Maybe I read the first three pages. I then proceeded to bundle the whole lot of books back into my backpack and return them unread to the library.

As a writer, I understand what it means to appreciate the subtle nuances of a finely crafted plot. I also understand what it is to appreciate the skill of execution with which an author tells a story. Caitlin Kiernan forced me to look beyond appreciation inspired a feeling of such intense jealousy that I could not read her books. I wanted to be the one who had written them. I wanted those words to be mine. It was a difficult, humbling (for a moment humiliating) moment to realize the limitations of my skill. How on Earth could I ever write again?

ExpandRead more... )
seraphcelene: (geum jan di by espirit_serein)
Much better than I could have hoped for, but not as great as I would have liked, The Hunger Games movie was a solid re-interpretation of Suzanne Collins's book. The movie is pared down, stripped, and the message hamstrung by its PG-13 rating so that the heart of the story is diminished; however, there a lot of things that the movie gets right.

ExpandHappy Hunger Games! And may the odds be ever in your favor. )
seraphcelene: (kickass zoe)
First, the most important question: Who'll be writing me that Normal Again/Sucker Punch crossover fic? Bonus points for incorporating Faith.

Overall, the movie was what I expected it to be, and it did what I expected it to do. Sucker Punch is an odd sort of zoetrope, psuedo-steampunk fantasy. I mostly enjoyed it. Robots, dragons, machine gun wielding samurai and hot chicks with swords, really what's not to love? Unfortunately, surprisingly, there are some things. It's amazing how Zack Snyder managed to make all that kinda boring.
ExpandYou have all the weapons you need. Now fight! )
seraphcelene: (curse you villains)
The first Twilight movie at least had the lulz. It was bad, but just ridiculous enough to be fun. I mean Charlie was all hilarity all the time. Unfortunately, New Moon did not live up to its predecessor. New Moon was bad AND boring. It was all angsty mumbling and emo voiceovers. Until Michael Sheen showed up, that is. The five minutes he spent on screen were pretty much the best part of the movie. I wish that I could say his five minutes were worth the whole movie, but that would be all kinds of lying. Dakota Fanning was kinda awesome, too. So, like, six minutes of awesome.

It is sad, but true, watching Twilight makes me forget that I actually like Kristen Stewart. Granted, she doesn't have a lot of range, but she's a good actress. Adventureland, The Cake Eaters, In the Land of Women, Panic Room are all great examples of her being a good actress. Too bad Twilight sucks so hard that I forget. Rob Pattinson might be a good actor, too. I don't know. I liked him in Remember Me, despite the rest of the movie. But there's not much to go on. More evidence is required.

So, yeah ... Twilight: New Moon ... not so much.
seraphcelene: (Default)
I loved it.

The 3D could have been the thing that made all the difference. I was enthralled and delighted by it in the beginning. All of the technical achievements were stunning. However, as the film progressed, I found myself just sinking into the story and forgetting that this was a singularly new experience. I usually avoid 3D like the plague. It gives me a massive headache. My eyes have never been able to adjust, but this next gen 3D was so easy. After a very brief period of adjustment (maybe 30 minutes or so), I forgot about it and there was no strain. This was just how the movie worked and it was pretty damn gorgeous.

Beware: Spoilers ahoy!

ExpandI see you )
seraphcelene: (books by glorious bite)
The 2008 film is nowhere near as complex or charming as the 2006 YA book. The style of the book just doesn't translate well to film and loses much of its intimacy and subtlety. The characters are pared down into simplistic components: gawky, emo Nick; shy, self-deprecating Norah; and spoiled, cookie cutter bitch Tris. Tris who is more "frenemy" than nemesis in the book is an out and out bad guy here and that is definitely to the detriment of the overall story. The other members of Nick's band, the Jerk Offs, become charming, if irresponsible, sidekicks who manage to lose Norah's best friend, Caroline, in a painfully constructed, gross, extraneous and somewhat slapsticky addition to the plot.

Much is changed from the novel to make it more friendly to a movie going audience - the book is very insular, traveling between the inner monologues of Nick and Norah - but, again, to the detriment of the overall story. The film flails around quite a bit and turns out to be alot less emo indie than its origins or the New York cityscape would like you to believe.

Kat Dennings is passable as Norah, capturing the awkward insecure grace notes of book Norah's defensive and angry shell. The cracking of that shell is part of the appeal of the novel as we watch Nick and Norah get under each other's skin. Norah has lost her fire, but still Nick gets to experience that dawning realization that he's begun to fall for another girl. Micheal Cera's Tris obsessed Nick still isn't as effectively cool and hipster as book Nick, but he's cute and we like him. Dennings and Cera play pretty well together, hemming and hawing their way towards mutual affection.

I might have been more satisfied if I hadn't read the book, but I doubt it. The movie I found disjointed and, at times, all over the place. The ending, however, was satisfying in its undemanding way and I smiled my way through the last five or so minutes.
seraphcelene: (Default)
Lucy Liu makes a very attractive looking corpse. Unfortunately, her dainty, kick-ass hotness isn't enough to save Rise: Blood Hunter from its needlessly convoluted plot and holes in logic big enough to drive a bus through. The film is dark and gritty, everything washed in shadows and blues to remind us that we are now in no man's land where vampires are sadistic but not quite equipped to deal with their cravings, fangless as they are. The vampires make an appropriately bloody mess of their meals, leaving body parts strewn across crime scenes, aided by various accoutrement to make up for what nature failed to give them.

Rise: Blood Hunter remains faithful to vampire lore only moderately, which really isn't such a problem, but the fact that the movie is bloody boring to boot makes it par for the course in the reinvention of the genre that seems underway. Everyone wants to shake things up, but go too far or not far enough. Thus far the most interesting shift in the emo vampire trend, I found, was 30 Days of Night (released four months after Rise: Blood Hunter) which hearkens back to a more folkloric vampire.

ExpandHere I thought bartenders were supposed to be like priests. )
seraphcelene: (Default)
Except for the general idea of the story and a few bare bones details, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button bears no resemblance to the F. Scott Fitzgerald short story. In my opinion that's not a bad thing. Although the short is quirky and original, the way that the movie has been extended provides a nuance and depth that more effectively explores the Mark Twain quote that inspired Fitzgerald: "Life would be infinitely happier if we could only be born at the age of eighty and gradually approach eighteen."

I found the movie to be funny, poignant and tragic. A lovely re-interpretation of the story with heart and depth. Brad Pitt was beautifully wistful as Benjamin, out of step even for the brief period when he and Daisy managed to "meet in the middle". ExpandYou can be as mad as a mad dog at the way things went. You could swear, curse the fates, but when it comes to the end, you have to let go. )
seraphcelene: (Default)
Sight gags, some decent CGI, and Andre Braugher as a cartoon military cut-out all equal a whole lot of nothing going on.

ExpandDid you know I can create a force field inside someone's body and expand it until they explode? )
seraphcelene: (it mocks me by vamptastica)
I thought all three of the Pirate movies were excessively long, but somehow At World's End felt less bloated even though it really wasn't. The movie was forever hurling us along on the adventure, never providing enough time to really digest the plot. In some ways that was to the movie's advantage, but in the end At World's End was still a revelation of flaws and failures.

ExpandThe Dutchman must have a Captain )
seraphcelene: (Default)
There is a piece of Pringle wedged under the "i" key on my laptop and it is driving me to distraction.

I will admit that I only watched Dan in Real Life out of the corner of my eye. I spent much of the movie reading [livejournal.com profile] cleolinda's hilarious reviews of the Twilight series. I'd started them on Friday and seeing as how I am confined to bed, weak with a cold (oh, woe is me) I decided to finish up reading them. What I did catch of the film, I found to be charming and adorable although I have severe issues with the film's overall theme.

ExpandYou are the murderer of love! )
seraphcelene: (Default)
After Sin saw Juno with her boyfriend, Positive Pat, she called me and said, "I thought of you through that whole movie." She said I'd like it because me and Juno had a lot of similarities. Juno kinda reminded her of me. Having now seen the film I can see what she's talking about.

ExpandLike the city in Alaska )
seraphcelene: (Default)
Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.

What happens when you get everything you ever thought you always wanted? If it's in the Whedonverse then it comes with a price. Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog was surprising, to say the least. I wasn't sure what I expected, but what I got definitely wasn't it. Once I got over the surprise, of characters bursting in to song and a villain who blogs the details of his world domination plans, I rather enjoyed it. It was just cheesy and tongue-in-cheek enough to get away with the over-the-top presentation. It never took itself too seriously, except for the end when it almost kinda did. ExpandRead more... )
ETA: Corrections made, it's a Freeze Ray, not an Ice Ray. Details matter, yo!

[livejournal.com profile] deird1 has an excellent post about Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog and Joss's way with villains. GO Read it.
seraphcelene: (Default)
I'm not sure how well Atonement works as an adaptation seeing as how I haven't read the book, but also seeing as how my focus on the movie was located largely on the mechanics of storytelling. I loved the use of sound, light and color. Atonement, the movie, was distractingly visual.

Expandshe's waiting for me, she love's me )
seraphcelene: (Default)
I love black and white films.

That Kind of Woman is beautifully melodramatic in the way that old movies are, but without being saccharine or overwrought.

Sophia Loren plays Kay, the mistress of The Man (George Sanders), a wealthy, older man, who falls in love with a young paratrooper on a train. Red, played with earnest sweetness and apple-pie naiveté by Tab Hunter, is determined to keep Kay despite her resistance and the counsel of his more world weary friend, George Kelly (Jack Warden).

ExpandSophia Loren and Tab Hunter are making cow eyes at each other )

In other news, Celebrity Circus is incredibly lame. It is, in fact, pretty much as lame as I thought it was going to be. Lame and dangerous. WTF, NBC! WTF!?
seraphcelene: (Default)
I didn't see the whole thing. Caught only the last hour or so. What I did see was cute, LOVED Kevin Smith with a great sweaty passion. Juliette Lewis was adorably batty and I couldn't get over the fact that Mrs. Dursley was in it (I am positive that she was playing another character and that Jennifer Garner was NOT engaged to Duddykins). I also found the plot questionable. Grief is a layered and complex emotion that requires more time then one might imagine to work through. Catch and Release, I think, didn't span enough time. The ending was too pat, as well. As an exploration of love and grief, I can't say that I bought it. Not at all. It didn't even get close to doing for me what, say, P.S., I Love You did.

However!

That first kiss between Timothy Olyphant and Jennifer Garner liked to knock my socks off. He just LOOKS like a good kisser, with that wide, smiling mouth and strong jaw.

Yeah, I'm shallow. I know.

But I believed them. I believed HIM. And the way she smiled and was shy and kinda blushy around him ... Oh, and the moment in the storage unit with her in the wedding dress that she never got to wear. Yeah.

And ... kisses.

For the win.
seraphcelene: (Default)
One of the things that I love about Hayao Miyazaki, as much as I hate to admit to it, is that each of his movies is in some way a love story. Some more than others, some more obviously than others. Princess Mononoke suggested a love for the Earth and nature in addition to romantic love between characters. In Spirited Away there was filial love, love for friends and constructed families, in addition to romantic love (which I will insist existed between Sen and Haku with my last breath -- Zara Helma's Bridge Across the Maybe Sea doesn't help me forget about them as a pairing). Kikki's Delivery Service, too, is a story about connections and belonging and varieties of love.

ExpandYou who swallowed a falling star ... a heart's a heavy burden )
seraphcelene: (Default)
No offense to Brian Singer because I really did enjoy the X-Men movies, but I still don't understand who decided that re-making Superman was a good idea. Even more obvious in my head then Micheal Keaton is Batman, Christopher Reeve *is* Superman. It took the phenomenal talent of Christian Bale to shift the idea of who The Batman could be and make me believe it, a feat we are gearing up to see again with Heath Ledger's portrayal of The Joker, how could any less be expected of the next actor to fill Reeve's blue tights.

What Christopher Reeve did was to create two separate and individual characters who just happened to be played by the same actor, and although we occasionally see them merge together for a moment or two, brief reminders that Clark Kent is Superman in disguise, it's that dedication to playing them as total polar opposites that makes Reeve's Superman iconic.

ExpandHow many 'f's in catastrophic? )

Profile

seraphcelene: (Default)
seraphcelene

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

Expand All Cut TagsCollapse All Cut Tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 05:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios