seraphcelene: (Default)
Oh, food lobbyists, you sure do bring the funny. In their reactionary panic to what I can only assume are diminishing sales, here comes a serious rotation of "milk comes from cows" commercials. However, for those of us who cannot actually, you know, digest milk, we totally appreciate the alternatives. Personally, I'm not all that fond of water in my cereal, plus dunking your cookies in kool-aid is kinda lame.

Then there's the corn people and their response to the high fructose corn syrup debate. I know there are studies linking it to increased cancer rates and to obesity as a result of the way that the body processes glucose versus fructose, but I don't know too much about it. Personally, it's not the high fructose corn syrup that I object to so much as it is the proliferation of high fructose corn syrup. Unlike sugar, it seems to be in practically EVERYTHING! Replacing HFCS with sugar doesn't solve the problem because the problem is an overabundance of non-nutritional, calorie laden junk. Break the junk food habit, I say. Reduce your consumption of canned, pre-packaged foods and you'll reduce intake of HFCS and sodium, to say the least.

Date: 2011-11-14 06:27 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] viciouswishes.livejournal.com
The HFC lobbiest are super aggressive. I tweeted something about a study linking HFCs to cancer, and immediately, I got tweeted at from them with their counter-info. I then asked them some questions, to which they never responded...

Date: 2011-11-15 02:30 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] a2zmom.livejournal.com
The best thing you can do for your health is cut out junk food that has no nutritional value. All it does it pack on pounds. There's a reason that diabetes is an epidemic.

Date: 2011-11-16 02:44 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] a2zmom.livejournal.com
That is a really sad state of affairs.

Date: 2011-11-15 03:37 am (UTC)From: [identity profile] lettered.livejournal.com
I've had to do a lot of research about HFCS for work, actually. Here's the thing:

HFCS is actually chemically almost exactly the same as sucrose. Sucrose is a fructose molecule + a glucose molecule. HFCS is 50% glucose and 50% fructose. It's called "high fructose" because it's made out of glucose (corn = starch, and starch is just a big chain of glucose molecules), and some of the glucose is altered into fructose. Some, meaning 50%.

From what I can tell, the problem with HFCS is exactly what you say: prevalence. Instances of obesity and diabetese have increased in conjunction with the use of HFCS, which has caused many people to cite HFCS as the cause. But the fact is, HFCS is cheap. That means it can be used in more products than use sucrose. The products that used to use sucrose are cheaper. There fore, people by more sweetened products; therefore obesity and diabetes increases.

And HFCS is cheaper because it is made from corn, and corn is a US cash cow.

Oh, look, back to cows.

The whole food industry is appalling. I like to put the onus on individuals and talk about how individual choice is the final decision maker etc etc, but individuals can't make healthy choices if they're working two jobs and every single quick cheap thing they can buy for their families to eat has a shit ton of HFCS in it because it makes big business a shit ton of money.

Oy.

Profile

seraphcelene: (Default)
seraphcelene

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 11:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios